Title: Settings, sensors, and tasks: Comment on Scherer, Trznadel, Fantini, and Coutinho
Authors: Jacobsen, Thomas  
Affiliation: Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
Language: en
Subject (DDC): Psychologie
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: American Psychological Association
Document Type: Article
Journal / Series / Working Paper (HSU): Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 
Volume: 13
Issue: 3
Page Start: 261
Page End: 263
Comments on article by Scherer et al. (see record 2018-16097-001). In their study, Scherer et al. explore the aesthetic experience of opera spectators using a 12-item fuzzy emotion questionnaire. Hence, they make a contribution to the emerging endeavors to conduct empirical aesthetic studies in the field. Laboratory studies of aesthetic appreciation may, to some extent, be limited with respect to ecological validity. Investigating aesthetic appreciation in the context of its usual occurrence—and, by association, investigating aesthetic appreciation in a fully ecologically valid way—is a desideratum of today’s research. Attempting to classify (field) studies across domains of aesthetic appreciation spans up an at least three-dimensional (3D) space, constituted by factors such as settings, sensors, and tasks. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)
Organization Units (connected with the publication): Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie 
ISSN: 1931-3896
DOI: 10.1037/aca0000253
Rights: 4.0 deutsch
Appears in Collections:Publications of the HSU Researchers

Show full item record

CORE Recommender


checked on May 24, 2022

Google ScholarTM




Items in openHSU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.