Please use this persistent identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.24405/14260
Title: Independent control processes? Evidence for concurrent distractor inhibition and attentional usage of distractor information
Authors: Gillich, Imke Marilla 
Jacobsen, Thomas  
Tomat, Miriam 
Wendt, Mike 
Affiliation: Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
Medical School Hamburg
Language: en
Keywords: Attentional adjustment;Cognitive control;Distractor processing;Proportion Congruent Effect
Subject (DDC): DDC::100 Philosophie und Psychologie
Subject: Human Experimental Psychology
Visual Perception
Cognitive Control
Issue Date: Jul-2019
Publisher: Elsevier
Document Type: Article
Journal / Series / Working Paper (HSU): Acta psychologica : international journal of psychonomics 
Volume: 198
Abstract: 
Interference evoked by a distractor presented prior to a target stimulus is reduced when the distractor-target SOA is increased, suggesting inhibition of distractor-related activation. Distractor processing is also assumed to be (strategically) adjusted to the proportions of congruent and incongruent target-distractor combinations, yielding a larger distractor interference effect when the proportion of congruent trials is higher (i.e., Proportion Congruent Effect, PCE). To explore the interplay of proportion congruent-based processing adjustment and the time course of distractor-related activation we varied the proportions of congruent and incongruent trials as well as the distractor-target SOA. To control for item-specific priming we kept distractor-related contingencies (i.e., frequency of individual distractor-target conjunctions) constant for a subset of the stimuli (and used a different subset to manipulate the proportions of congruent and incongruent trials). A PCE occurred, even for the subset of stimuli associated with constant distractor-related contingencies, thus ruling out item-specific contingency learning. Distractor interference was reduced when the SOA was increased, but this reduction did not differ between the proportion congruent conditions, as confirmed by a Bayesian analysis. Our results are consistent with independent processes pertaining to usage of distractor information for biasing response selection and distractor inhibition during the SOA. Alternative interpretations of the independent effects of the PC manipulation and the distractor-target SOA are discussed.
Description: 
Zweitveröffentlichung;
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102879
Organization Units (connected with the publication): Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie 
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24405/14260
URL: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85068500325
ISSN: 0001-6918
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102879
Rights: 4.0 deutsch
Appears in Collections:Publications of the HSU Researchers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
openHSU_14260.pdf828.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on May 28, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in openHSU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.