|Title:||Four parameters for measuring democratic deliberation||Subtitle:||theoretical and methodological challenges and how to respond||Authors:||Fleuß, Dannica
Schaal, Gary S.
|Language:||eng||Keywords:||Universitätsbibliographie;Evaluation 2018||Issue Date:||2018||Publisher:||ZBW||Document Type:||Article||Pages:||circa 12 Seiten||Publisher Place:||[Kiel ; Hamburg]||Abstract:||
Although measuring democratic deliberation is necessary for a valid measurement of the performance of democracies, it poses serious theoretical and methodological challenges. The most serious problem in the context of research on democratic performance is the need for a theoretical and methodological approach for "upscaling" the measurement of deliberation from the micro and meso level to the macro level. The systemic approach offers a useful framework for this purpose. Building on this framework, this article offers a modular approach consisting of four parameters for conceptualization, measurement, and aggregation which can be adjusted to make the measurement of democratic deliberation compatible with the various general measurement approaches adopted by different scholars.
|Organization Units (connected with the publication):||Politikwissenschaft, insb. der Politischen Theorie||URL:||http://hdl.handle.net/10419/176756||DOI:||10.17645/pag.v6i1.1199|
|Appears in Collections:||2018|
Show full item record
checked on Aug 16, 2022
Items in openHSU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.