Please use this persistent identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.24405/470
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLang, Fabian-
dc.contributor.authorFink, Andreas-
dc.contributor.authorBrandt, Tobias-
dc.contributor.otherAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg i. Br.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-24T14:12:11Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-24T14:12:11Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.otherhttp://edoc.sub.uni-hamburg.de/hsu/volltexte/2014/3040/-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.24405/470-
dc.description.sponsorshipBWL, insb. Wirtschaftsinformatik-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.relation.ispartofResearch paper / Institute of Computer Science-
dc.subject.ddcWirtschaft-
dc.subject.otherEntscheidungsunterstützung-
dc.subject.otherVerhandlung-
dc.subject.otherProtokoll-
dc.titleDesign of Automated Negotiation Mechanisms for Decentralized Heterogeneous Machine Scheduling-
dc.typeWorking Paper-
dc.description.secondabstractThe increasing coupling of planning and scheduling between different companies leads to novel challenges in devising and implementing effective decision support systems. In this paper, we describe a hard decentralized scheduling problem with heterogeneous machines and competing job sets that belong to different self-interested stakeholders (agents). These agents want to minimize their costs that consist of individual tardiness cost as well as their share of the machine operating cost. The determination of a beneficial solution, i.e., a respective contract in terms of a common schedule, is particularly difficult due to information asymmetry and self-interested behavior of the involved agents. To solve this coordination problem, we present two automated negotiation protocols with a set of optional building blocks. In the first protocol, new solutions are iteratively generated as mutations of a single provisional contract and proposed to the agents, while feasible rules with quotas restrict the acceptance decisions of the agents and, thus, the successive adaptation of the provisional contract. The second protocol is based on a population of contracts and mimics evolutionary processes. For evaluation purposes, we built a simulation testbed and conducted computational experiments. The computational study shows that the protocols can achieve high quality solutions very close to results from centralized multi-criteria procedures. Particular building block configurations yield improved outcomes, e.g., in case that the agents are also allowed to make contract proposals. Thus, the presented approach contributes to the methodology and practice of collaborative decision making.-
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:705-opus-30406-
hsu.contributor.authorLang, Fabian-
hsu.contributor.authorFink, Andreas-
hsu.contributor.authorBrandt, Tobias-
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume14-
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue01-
local.submission.typefull-text-
local.date.available2014-01-16-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltext_sWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeWorking Paper-
crisitem.author.deptBWL, insb. Wirtschaftsinformatik-
crisitem.author.deptDekanat Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften-
crisitem.author.deptFakultät für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultäten-
Appears in Collections:Publications of the HSU Researchers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
openHSU_470.pdf786.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in openHSU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.