Title: Adoption of task-specific sets of visual attention
Authors: Wendt, Mike
Kähler, Svantje T. 
Luna-Rodriguez, Aquiles 
Jacobsen, Thomas 
Language: eng
Issue Date: 2017
Document Type: Article
Source: Enthalten in: Frontiers in psychology. - Lausanne : Frontiers Research Foundation, 2008. - Online-Ressource . - Bd. 8.2017, 687 (9. Mai), insges. 11 S.
Journal / Series / Working Paper (HSU): Frontiers in psychology
Volume: 8
Issue: Artikel 687
Abstract: 
Evidence from behavioral and physiological studies suggests attentional weighting of stimulus information from different sources, according to task demands. We investigated the adoption of task-specific attentional sets by administering a flanker task, which required responding to a centrally presented letter while ignoring two adjacent letters, and a same-different judgment task, which required a homogenous/heterogeneous classification concerning the complete three-letter string. To assess the distribution of attentional weights across the letter locations we intermixed trials of a visual search task, in which a target stimulus occurred randomly in any of these locations. Search task reaction times displayed a stronger center-to periphery gradient, indicating focusing of visual attention on the central location, when the search task was intermixed into blocks of trials of the flanker task than into blocks of trials of the same-different task (Experiment 1) and when a cue indicated the likely occurrence of the flanker task as compared to the likely occurrence the same-different task (Experiment 2). These findings demonstrate flexible adoption of task-specific sets of visual attention that can be implemented during preparation. In addition, responses in the intermixed search task trials were faster and (marginally significantly) more error-prone after preparation for a (letter) task repetition than for a task switch, suggesting that response caution is reduced during preparation for a task repetition.
Organization Units (connected with the publication): Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie 
Publisher DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00687
Appears in Collections:3 - Publication references (without fulltext)

Show full item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

14
checked on Apr 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in openHSU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.