openHSU logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Log In
  • Communities & Collections
  1. Home
  2. Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg
  3. Publications
  4. 3 - Publication references (without full text)
  5. When do employees feel isolated when working from home?
 
Options
Show all metadata fields

When do employees feel isolated when working from home?

Longitudinal trajectories, antecedents and outcomes of workplace isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic
Publication date
2025-07-08
Document type
Forschungsartikel
Author
Efimov, Ilona
Krick, Annika 
Harth, Volker
Felfe, Jörg 
Mache, Stefanie
Organisational unit
Arbeits-, Organisations- und Wirtschaftspsychologie 
DTEC.bw 
DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1601214
URI
https://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/20828
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105011352177
Project
Digital Leadership & Health 
Publisher
Frontiers Research Foundation
Series or journal
Frontiers in Psychology
ISSN
1664-1078
Periodical volume
16
Peer-reviewed
✅
Part of the university bibliography
✅
  • Additional Information
Language
English
Keyword
Health-oriented leadership
Person-oriented approach
Remote work
Social relationships at work
Teleworking
Workplace isolation
Abstract
Introduction: Previous longitudinal studies investigated loneliness in general populations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Less is known about workplace isolation among employees working from home (WFH). Based on job demands-resources and conservation-of-resources theories, this study aims to analyze workplace isolation of employees WFH in relation to their WFH intensity.
Methods: This study examined the change in workplace isolation and WFH intensity over 5 measurement points of 512 employees using multilevel growth curve analysis (GCA), identified groups of participants with distinct trajectories of workplace isolation and WFH intensity using latent profile analysis (LPA), and investigated antecedents and consequences of profile membership.
Results: GCA indicated an overall negative linear and quadratic relationship between time and workplace isolation, as well as interaction effects between time and WFH intensity on workplace isolation. LPA identified 3 groups: (1) high WFH intensity and low isolation, (2) low WFH intensity and high isolation, (3) high WFH intensity and high isolation. Subsequent analyses revealed that individuals in profile 1 had high levels of health-oriented self-leadership (SelfCare) and social support by colleagues, and low levels of communication difficulties, health-oriented employee-leadership (StaffCare) and extraversion. Regarding differences, highest commitment was identified among individuals displaying low WFH intensity (profile 2), whereas highest self-rated performance was prevalent among individuals experiencing low workplace isolation (profile 1).
Discussion: Applying GCA and LPA in this line of research is novel and adds to the understanding of both between-and within-effects of workplace isolation and WFH intensity. Knowledge about relevant resources (e.g., SelfCare) and demands (e.g., communication difficulties) may inform organizational practices aimed at preventing isolation in remote and hybrid work settings.
Description
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
Version
Published version
Access right on openHSU
Metadata only access

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Send Feedback
  • Imprint