Please use this persistent identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.24405/14261
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStrobach, Tilo-
dc.contributor.authorWendt, Mike-
dc.contributor.authorTomat, Miriam-
dc.contributor.authorLuna-Rodriguez, Aquiles-
dc.contributor.authorJacobsen, Thomas-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-26T09:18:11Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-26T09:18:11Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-
dc.identifier.issn0001-6918-
dc.identifier.issn1873-6297-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.24405/14261-
dc.description.abstractPerformance in task switching experiments is worse when the current stimulus is associated with different responses in the two tasks (i.e., incongruent condition) than when it is associated with the same response (i.e., congruent condition). This congruency effect reflects some sort of application of the irrelevant task's stimulus-response translation rules. Manipulating the recency and the proportion of congruent and incongruent trials results in a modulation of the congruency effect (i.e., Congruency Sequence Effect, CSE, and Proportion Congruency Effect, PCE, respectively), suggesting attentional adjustment of processing weights. Here, we investigated the impact of task switching practice on the congruency effect and the modulation thereof by (a) re-analyzing the data of a task switching experiment involving six consecutive sessions and (b) conducting a novel four-session experiment in which the proportions of congruent and incongruent trials were manipulated. Although practice appeared to reduce the reaction times overall and the task switch costs (i.e., slower reaction times after task switches than after task repetitions) to an asymptotic level, the congruency effect as well as its modulations remained remarkably constant. These findings thus do not provide evidence that conflict effects between tasks and attentional adjustment are affected by task switching practice.-
dc.description.sponsorshipAllgemeine und Biologische Psychologie-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofActa psychologica : international journal of psychonomics-
dc.subjectAttentional adjustment-
dc.subjectCognitive training-
dc.subjectConflict processing-
dc.subjectPractice-
dc.subjectTask switching-
dc.subject.ddc100 Philosophie & Psychologie-
dc.titleNo evidence for the reduction of task competition and attentional adjustment during task-switching practice-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103036-
dc.identifier.pmid32086004-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85079390200-
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume204-
local.submission.typefull-text-
dc.type.articleScientific Article-
hsu.openaccess.green✅-
hsu.peerReviewed✅-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltext_sWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptAllgemeine und Biologische Psychologie-
crisitem.author.deptAllgemeine und Biologische Psychologie-
crisitem.author.deptAllgemeine und Biologische Psychologie-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1523-3996-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät für Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät für Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät für Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften-
Appears in Collections:1 - Open Access Publications (except Theses)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
openHSU_14261.pdf761.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Apr 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric

User Tools
Login to see more information

Items in openHSU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.