Please use this persistent identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.24405/14260
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGillich, Imke Marilla-
dc.contributor.authorJacobsen, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorTomat, Miriam-
dc.contributor.authorWendt, Mike-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-26T09:02:17Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-26T09:02:17Z-
dc.date.issued2019-07-
dc.identifier.issn1873-6297-
dc.identifier.issn0001-6918-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.24405/14260-
dc.description.abstractInterference evoked by a distractor presented prior to a target stimulus is reduced when the distractor-target SOA is increased, suggesting inhibition of distractor-related activation. Distractor processing is also assumed to be (strategically) adjusted to the proportions of congruent and incongruent target-distractor combinations, yielding a larger distractor interference effect when the proportion of congruent trials is higher (i.e., Proportion Congruent Effect, PCE). To explore the interplay of proportion congruent-based processing adjustment and the time course of distractor-related activation we varied the proportions of congruent and incongruent trials as well as the distractor-target SOA. To control for item-specific priming we kept distractor-related contingencies (i.e., frequency of individual distractor-target conjunctions) constant for a subset of the stimuli (and used a different subset to manipulate the proportions of congruent and incongruent trials). A PCE occurred, even for the subset of stimuli associated with constant distractor-related contingencies, thus ruling out item-specific contingency learning. Distractor interference was reduced when the SOA was increased, but this reduction did not differ between the proportion congruent conditions, as confirmed by a Bayesian analysis. Our results are consistent with independent processes pertaining to usage of distractor information for biasing response selection and distractor inhibition during the SOA. Alternative interpretations of the independent effects of the PC manipulation and the distractor-target SOA are discussed.-
dc.description.sponsorshipAllgemeine und Biologische Psychologie-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofActa psychologica : international journal of psychonomics-
dc.subjectAttentional adjustment-
dc.subjectHuman Experimental Psychology-
dc.subjectVisual Perception-
dc.subjectCognitive control-
dc.subjectDistractor processing-
dc.subjectCognitive Control-
dc.subjectProportion Congruent Effect-
dc.subject.ddc100 Philosophie & Psychologie-
dc.titleIndependent control processes? Evidence for concurrent distractor inhibition and attentional usage of distractor information-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102879-
dc.identifier.pmid31301574-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85068500325-
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume198-
local.submission.typefull-text-
dc.type.articleScientific Article-
hsu.openaccess.green✅-
hsu.peerReviewed✅-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltext_sWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptAllgemeine und Biologische Psychologie-
crisitem.author.deptAllgemeine und Biologische Psychologie-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1523-3996-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät für Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät für Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften-
Appears in Collections:1 - Open Access Publications (except Theses)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
openHSU_14260.pdf828.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Apr 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric

User Tools
Login to see more information

Items in openHSU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.