openHSU logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Log In
  • Communities & Collections
  1. Home
  2. Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg
  3. Publications
  4. 3 - Publication references (without full text)
  5. Target–distractor congruency: sequential effects in a temporal flanker task
 
Options
Show all metadata fields

Target–distractor congruency: sequential effects in a temporal flanker task

Publication date
2018-08-06
Document type
Research article
Author
Tomat, Miriam 
Wendt, Mike
Luna-Rodriguez, Aquiles 
Sprengel, Michael 
Jacobsen, Thomas 
Organisational unit
Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie 
DOI
10.1007/s00426-018-1061-0
URI
https://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/4419
ISSN
0340-0727
Series or journal
Psychological Research
Periodical volume
84
Periodical issue
2
First page
292
Last page
301
Peer-reviewed
✅
Part of the university bibliography
✅
  • Additional Information
Abstract
The Congruency Sequence Effect (CSE) denotes the common finding that distractor–target Congruency Effects are reduced after incongruent compared to after congruent trials. Although the CSE is widely attributed to attentional adjustment (i.e., increasing or decreasing the bias in attentional weights regarding processing the target or distractor), unequivocal evidence for this assumption is missing. To investigate the CSE and attentional adjustment we used a temporal flanker task and intermixed a “temporal search task”, in which a target stimulus occurred randomly at one of two temporal positions, corresponding to the temporal positions of the target and the distractor occurrence in the temporal flanker task. We observed a CSE that could not be explained in terms of feature sequences, distractor-related contingencies, or a strategy of reversed distractor–response priming after incongruent trials. Furthermore, following a temporal search task trial, the Congruency Effect was larger when the search target occurred on the first than on the second temporal position, demonstrating that a reduced attentional bias towards the second temporal position increased interference from a distractor presented on the first temporal position. This supports a crucial assumption of the attentional adjustment account of the CSE. Performance in the temporal search task, however, provided no evidence for attentional adjustment. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Version
Published version
Access right on openHSU
Metadata only access

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Send Feedback
  • Imprint