openHSU logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg
  3. Publications
  4. 3 - Publication references (without full text)
  5. Target–distractor congruency

Target–distractor congruency

Sequential effects in a temporal flanker task
Publication date
2018-08-06
Document type
Research article
Author
Tomat, Miriam  
Wendt, Mike
Luna-Rodriguez, Aquiles  
Sprengel, Michael  
Jacobsen, Thomas  
Organisational unit
Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie  
DOI
10.1007/s00426-018-1061-0
URI
https://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/4419
Publisher
Springer
Series or journal
Psychological Research
ISSN
0340-0727
Periodical volume
84
Periodical issue
2
First page
292
Last page
301
Is part of
https://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/19271
Peer-reviewed
✅
Part of the university bibliography
✅
Additional Information
Language
English
Abstract
The Congruency Sequence Effect (CSE) denotes the common finding that distractor–target Congruency Effects are reduced after incongruent compared to after congruent trials. Although the CSE is widely attributed to attentional adjustment (i.e., increasing or decreasing the bias in attentional weights regarding processing the target or distractor), unequivocal evidence for this assumption is missing. To investigate the CSE and attentional adjustment we used a temporal flanker task and intermixed a “temporal search task”, in which a target stimulus occurred randomly at one of two temporal positions, corresponding to the temporal positions of the target and the distractor occurrence in the temporal flanker task. We observed a CSE that could not be explained in terms of feature sequences, distractor-related contingencies, or a strategy of reversed distractor–response priming after incongruent trials. Furthermore, following a temporal search task trial, the Congruency Effect was larger when the search target occurred on the first than on the second temporal position, demonstrating that a reduced attentional bias towards the second temporal position increased interference from a distractor presented on the first temporal position. This supports a crucial assumption of the attentional adjustment account of the CSE. Performance in the temporal search task, however, provided no evidence for attentional adjustment. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Version
Published version
Access right on openHSU
Metadata only access

  • Privacy policy
  • Send Feedback
  • Imprint