openHSU logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Log In
  • Communities & Collections
  1. Home
  2. Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg
  3. Publications
  4. 3 - Publication references (without full text)
  5. Visual marking for search
 
Options
Show all metadata fields

Visual marking for search

Behavioral and event-related potential analyses
Publication date
2002-04-09
Document type
Forschungsartikel
Author
Jacobsen, Thomas 
Humphreys, Glyn W.
Schröger, Erich
Roeber, Urte
Organisational unit
Institut für Allgemeine Psychologie, Universität Leipzig
DOI
10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00143-x
URI
https://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/17173
Publisher
Elsevier
Series or journal
Cognitive brain research
ISSN
0926-6410
Periodical volume
14
Periodical issue
3
First page
410
Last page
421
Peer-reviewed
✅
Part of the university bibliography
Nein
  • Additional Information
Language
English
Keyword
Visual selective attention
Visual marking
Visual search
Electrophysiology
Abstract
Visual marking is an attentional mechanism of prioritizing the selection of new static or moving objects via top-down intentional inhibition of old objects [Psychol. Rev. 104 (1997) 90–122]. The present study investigated the operation of visual marking using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Participants searched a display for one of two target letters among randomly selected letter distractors. Two item set sizes were used in a two-stage display. Half of the items appeared for 1000 ms in the first stage followed by the remainder in the second stage. Three blocked conditions were used. In the Preview condition, targets appeared as one of a set of new items in Display 2. Items in Display 1 could thus be excluded from search by visual marking. In the Control condition, old items changed when new items appeared, and the target was equally likely to be at an old or a new position. In this condition marking is unlikely to be engaged since old locations could contain the target. In the Search condition, targets appeared either in Display 1 (80%) or Display 2 (20%), and Display 1 items did not change. The results showed condition-contingent attentional modulations in the N1 / N2 range. In addition, a broadly distributed centrally-preponderant sustained negativity was obtained in the 350–750 ms time range after the onset of Display 1 for the Preview–Control comparison. This latter negativity is interpreted to reflect the processes involved in setting up and maintaining of visual marking. It demonstrated an effect of visual marking well prior to Display 2 onset, thereby ruling out an account of the preview benefit solely due to attentional capture by Display 2 item onset. (© 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved)
Version
Published version
Access right on openHSU
Metadata only access

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Send Feedback
  • Imprint