Argument mining for organizational research: a computer-aided analysis of organizational talk
Publication date
2026-07-01
Document type
Forschungsartikel
Author
Organisational unit
Scopus ID
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Series or journal
Organizational Research Methods
ISSN
Peer-reviewed
✅
Part of the university bibliography
✅
Language
English
Keyword
argument mining
natural language processing
organizational talk
organization–environment relationship
social media
Abstract
Argument mining—the automatic identification, classification, and linking of argumentative text—has been studied in natural language processing (NLP) for more than a decade. Despite its claimed potential for applications in legal, political, and social contexts, it remained largely unexplored in organizational research. This article introduces aspect-based argument mining (ABAM) as a methodical innovation for studying how organizations justify decisions, construct legitimacy, and relate to their environments through communicative acts. By scaling up the analysis of argumentative structures beyond the limits of small-scale, qualitative studies, ABAM enables the recognition and systematic analysis of argumentation patterns in large text corpora that were hardly detectable with previous (computational) approaches. The potential is demonstrated by a longitudinal case study of Twitter debates on nuclear energy in Germany, revealing how shifting societal values—particularly the reframing of nuclear energy from a safety to a climate issue—produced growing misalignments between organizational talk of a political party organization and its social media environment.
Description
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Version
Online first
Access right on openHSU
Metadata only access
