Publication:
Comparison between Direct Numerical Simulation and k–ε–Model Prediction of the Flow in a Vessel Stirred by a Rushton Turbine

cris.virtual.departmentStrömungsmechanik
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.departmentbrowseStrömungsmechanik
cris.virtual.departmentbrowseStrömungsmechanik
cris.virtualsource.departmentba61e71a-d073-4609-89b6-c10b460b09a8
cris.virtualsource.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.contributor.authorBartels, Christian
dc.contributor.authorBreuer, Michael
dc.contributor.authorDurst, Franz
dc.contributor.editorAkker, Hendrikus E. van den
dc.contributor.editorDerksen, J. J.
dc.date.issued2000
dc.description.abstractThe k-ɛ model is the most prevalent turbulence model in the numerical simulation of stirred vessel flows. Despite the fact that many other turbulence models—such as the κ-ω model and the RNG κ-ɛ model—have been introduced to improve the κ-ɛmodel, it has remained the most frequently utilized model for routine investigations in industry. The reason for this predominance is that the κ-ɛ model has been quite successfully applied to many complex flow problems. Moreover, the weaknesses of the model are relatively well known and can be accounted for. The comparison of the large-scale flow field shows a good overall agreement of the observed flow features for both types of simulations. On the other hand, close comparison revealed differences between DNS and κ-ɛ simulations where the DNS predictions were almost always closer to experimental results. The results for the turbulent kinetic energy κ also show some evidence of better agreement between experiment and DNS but it is not completely clear right now how reliable the information for turbulent kinetic energy is.
dc.description.versionNA
dc.identifier.citationBartels, C., Breuer, M., Durst, F.: Comparison between Direct Numerical Simulation and k–ε–Model Prediction of the Flow in a Vessel Stirred by a Rushton Turbine, Proc. of the 10th European Conf. on Mixing, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, July 2–5, 2000, H.E.A. van der Akker and J.J. Derksen (eds.), pp. 239–246, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, (2000).
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/B978-044450476-0/50031-5
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-444-50476-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/15045
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science
dc.relation.conference10th European Conf. on Mixing, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, July 2–5, 2000
dc.relation.orgunitStrömungsmechanik
dc.rights.accessRightsmetadata only access
dc.titleComparison between Direct Numerical Simulation and k–ε–Model Prediction of the Flow in a Vessel Stirred by a Rushton Turbine
dc.typeBook part
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.booktitle10th European Conference on Mixing
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceAmsterdam
dspace.entity.typePublication
hsu.peerReviewed
hsu.uniBibliographyNein
oaire.citation.endPage246
oaire.citation.startPage239
Files