openHSU logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg
  3. Publications
  4. 3 - Publication references (without full text)
  5. Comparative analysis of phase-field and intrinsic cohesive zone models for fracture simulations in multiphase materials with interfaces: Investigation of the influence of the microstructure on the fracture properties

Comparative analysis of phase-field and intrinsic cohesive zone models for fracture simulations in multiphase materials with interfaces: Investigation of the influence of the microstructure on the fracture properties

Publication date
2024-12-27
Document type
Forschungsartikel
Author
Najafi Koopas, Rasoul  
Rezaei, Shahed
Rauter, Natalie  
Ostwald, Richard 
Lammering, Rolf
Organisational unit
Festkörpermechanik  
DTEC.bw  
DOI
10.3390/app15010160
URI
https://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/21725
Publisher
MDPI AG
Series or journal
Applied Sciences
ISSN
2076-3417
Periodical volume
15
Periodical issue
1
Article ID
160
Is part of
https://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/21730
Peer-reviewed
✅
Part of the university bibliography
✅
Additional Information
Language
English
Keyword
finite element method
interface debonding
material microstructure
matrix cracking
phase-field fracture
dtec.bw
Abstract
This study evaluates four widely used fracture simulation methods, comparing their computational expenses and implementation complexities within the finite element (FE) framework when employed on heterogeneous solids. Fracture methods considered encompass the intrinsic cohesive zone model (CZM) using zero-thickness cohesive interface elements (CIEs), the standard phase-field fracture (SPFM) approach, the cohesive phase-field fracture (CPFM) approach, and an innovative hybrid model. The hybrid approach combines the CPFM fracture method with the CZM, specifically applying the CZM within the interface zone. The finite element model studied is characterized by three specific phases: inclusions, matrix, and the interface zone. This case study serves as a potential template for meso- or micro-level simulations involving a variety of composite materials. The thorough assessment of these modeling techniques indicates that the CPFM approach stands out as the most effective computational model, provided that the thickness of the interface zone is not significantly smaller than that of the other phases. In materials like concrete, which contain interfaces within their microstructure, the interface thickness is notably small when compared to other phases. This leads to the hybrid model standing as the most authentic finite element model, utilizing CIEs within the interface to simulate interface debonding. A significant finding from this investigation is that within the CPFM method, for a specific interface thickness, convergence with the hybrid model can be observed. This suggests that the CPFM fracture method could serve as a unified fracture approach for multiphase materials when a specific interfacial thickness is used. In addition, this research provides valuable insights that can advance efforts to fine-tune material microstructures. An investigation of the influence of interfacial material properties, voids, and the spatial arrangement of inclusions shows a pronounced effect of these parameters on the fracture toughness of the material.
Description
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Version
Published version
Access right on openHSU
Metadata only access

  • Privacy policy
  • Send Feedback
  • Imprint