openHSU logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Log In
  • Communities & Collections
  1. Home
  2. Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg
  3. Publications
  4. 1 - Initial full text publications (except theses)
  5. Reluctance in international politics: a conceptualization
 
Options
Show all metadata fields

Reluctance in international politics: a conceptualization

Publication date
2016-02-27
Document type
Research article
Author
Destradi, Sandra
Organisational unit
GIGA (German Institute of Global and Area Studies)
Politikwissenschaft, insb. Internationale Beziehungen und Regional Governance
DOI
10.24405/4283
URI
https://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/4283
URN
nbn:de:gbv:705-opus-31330
Series or journal
European Journal of International Relations
Part of the university bibliography
✅
Files
 openHSU_4283.pdf (494.87 KB)
  • Additional Information
DDC Class
320 Politikwissenschaft
Keyword
Außenpolitik
Governance
Internationale Beziehungen
Macht
Zurückhaltung
Aufstrebende Mächte
Foreign Policy
Governance
International Relations
Power
Reluctance
Rising Powers
Abstract
Contemporary rising powers have often pursued a hesitant and ambiguous foreign-policy and have belied the expectations of potential followers and established powers who would want them to engage more actively in global and regional governance. The existing analytical toolbox of International Relations does not offer suitable concepts to make sense of the widespread phenomenon of states that pursue hesitant, inconsistent courses of action and do not bring to bear their power resources to coherently manage international crises that potentially affect them. A notion that is frequently employed to describe this peculiar type of foreign policy is that of ‘reluctance’, but this concept has not been systematically defined, discussed or theorized. This article aims to introduce the concept of reluctance into the field of International Relations. It develops a conceptualization of reluctance by identifying the concept’s semantic field and discussing how reluctance relates to the similar but distinct notions of exceptionalism, isolationism, under-aggression and under-balancing (concept reconstruction); on that basis, the article outlines the constitutive dimensions of reluctance — hesitation and recalcitrance — and their operationalization (concept building). Several illustrative cases of (non-)reluctant rising powers are used to exemplify the concept structure and to show the analytical usefulness of the concept of reluctance, which refers to a distinct set of phenomena that are not addressed by other concepts in International Relations. An application of the concept allows us to identify policy shifts and differences across issue areas, as well as open up avenues for further research.
Cite as
European Journal of International Relations 2016
Version
Not applicable (or unknown)
Access right on openHSU
Open access

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Send Feedback
  • Imprint