Publication:
Skewness, Tax Progression, and Demand for Redistribution

cris.customurl 4171
cris.virtual.department Volkswirtschaftslehre, insb. Behavioral Economics
cris.virtual.department #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.departmentbrowse Volkswirtschaftslehre, insb. Behavioral Economics
cris.virtual.departmentbrowse Volkswirtschaftslehre, insb. Behavioral Economics
cris.virtual.departmentbrowse Volkswirtschaftslehre, insb. Behavioral Economics
cris.virtualsource.department 632f9572-7615-4f76-b278-dcb40253af41
cris.virtualsource.department #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.contributor.author Pogorelskiy, Kirill
dc.contributor.author Traub, Stefan
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.description.abstract We introduce a skewness-based approach to measure tax progression and demand for redistribution. Adapting a novel, quantilebased statistical measure of skewness to right-skewed income distributions, we uncover its political economy foundation, by simultaneously relating the same measure to the classical model of income redistribution due to Meltzer and Richard (1981), to the Prospect Of Upward Mobility (POUM) mechanism due to B`enabou and Ok (2001), and to the progressivity of a tax schedule. In an empirical analysis of UK income distributions in 1979 – 2013, we find that skewness has increased over time, with the rich moving further away from the median. While the magnitude of the increase has remained small enough so that observed redistribution (or lack thereof ) could be consistent with POUM hypothesis, more recent periods show an increase in tax progression.
dc.description.version NA
dc.identifier.doi 10.2139/ssrn.2958128
dc.identifier.uri https://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/4171
dc.language.iso en
dc.relation.journal Discussion paper series / Centre for Research in Economic Theory and Applications
dc.relation.orgunit Volkswirtschaftslehre, insb. Behavioral Economics
dc.rights.accessRights metadata only access
dc.title Skewness, Tax Progression, and Demand for Redistribution
dc.title.alternative Evidence from the UK
dc.type Research article
dspace.entity.type Publication
hsu.uniBibliography
oaire.citation.volume 29
Files