openHSU logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg
  3. Publications
  4. 3 - Publication references (without full text)
  5. Acceptance of an upper body exoskeleton for occupational tasks among soldiers

Acceptance of an upper body exoskeleton for occupational tasks among soldiers

Publication date
2026-06-18
Document type
Forschungsartikel
Author
Schubert, Tim  
Weidner, Robert  
Organisational unit
Fertigungstechnik  
DTEC.bw  
DOI
10.3389/fpubh.2026.1793794
URI
https://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/23991
Project
Intelligente Auslegung und Optimierung von KI basierten, physischen (Körper-) Unterstützungssystemen mit moderner Antriebstechnologie  
Publisher
Frontiers Media
Series or journal
Frontiers in Public Health
ISSN
2296-2565
Periodical volume
14
Article ID
1793794
Peer-reviewed
✅
Part of the university bibliography
✅
Funding(s)
Publikationsfonds der HSU/UniBw H  
Additional Information
Language
English
Keyword
Acceptance
Ergonomic support
Exoskeleton
Occupational health
Wearable assistive technology
dtec.bw
Abstract
Introduction:
This study investigated the user experience and perceived acceptance of a shoulder exoskeleton during Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) tasks in a military context. While laboratory research on the same system has shown measurable reductions in muscle activity of 29%–41%, the present field study focused on how end users subjectively evaluate the exoskeleton.
Methods:
Twenty-seven soldiers of the German Armed Forces tested the exoskeleton for approximately 30 min while completing standardized scenarios, including overhead lifting, vehicle decontamination with a spray lance, and casualty rescue. Immediately afterward, participants completed a structured questionnaire assessing usability, wearing comfort, impact on work routine, perceived support, usefulness, skepticism, and intention to use.
Results:
Overall, the exoskeleton was rated as easy to operate (mean item score: 5.15 ± 1.31 on a 7-point scale) and reasonably comfortable to wear (4.64 ± 1.31). Compatibility with work routines and perceived usefulness received moderate ratings (3.79 ± 1.53 and 3.05 ± 1.64, respectively), whereas the perceived mechanical support was notably low (2.78 ± 1.78). Skepticism (2.27 ± 1.08), and intentions to use the system were moderate (3.42 ± 2.08).
Discussion:
The user feedback suggests that while the current design is usable and generally comfortable, acceptance may improve substantially if future systems provide a higher amount of support and an expanded functionality to address a wider variety of tasks. These findings underscore that, beyond biomechanical effectiveness, user acceptance is a critical factor for the successful implementation of exoskeletons as occupational health interventions.
Description
This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Version
Published version
Access right on openHSU
Metadata only access

  • Privacy policy
  • Send Feedback
  • Imprint