openHSU logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Log In
  • Communities & Collections
  1. Home
  2. Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg
  3. Publications
  4. 3 - Publication references (without full text)
  5. Contested fields of equality, diversity and inclusion at work: an institutional work lens on power relations and actors’ strategies in Germany and Turkey
 
Options
Show all metadata fields

Contested fields of equality, diversity and inclusion at work: an institutional work lens on power relations and actors’ strategies in Germany and Turkey

Publication date
2022-06-11
Document type
Research article
Author
Kornau, Angela 
Knappert, Lena
Tatli, Ahu
Sieben, Barbara 
Organisational unit
Personalpolitik 
DOI
10.1080/09585192.2022.2086014
URI
https://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/14362
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85131720828
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Series or journal
International journal of human resource management
ISSN
1466-4399
Periodical volume
34
Periodical issue
12
First page
2481
Last page
2515
Peer-reviewed
✅
Part of the university bibliography
✅
  • Additional Information
Language
English
Keyword
Diversity
Equality
Inclusion
Institutional actors
Institutional work
National context
Power
Abstract
In this paper, we explore how institutional actors push or resist equality, diversity and inclusion in light of power relations in their respective country contexts. We conducted interviews with a range of institutional actors, including governmental organizations, employer representatives, unions, professional associations, and civil society organizations working on EDI issues in Germany and Turkey, two countries with very different socioeconomic and political settings. Our findings suggest that EDI fields are structured by country-specific power relations: they appear as competitively dispersed in Germany and politically polarized in Turkey, depending on the social position of the actors and the type of field fragmentation. These field characteristics, in turn, nurture different patterns of actors’ strategies such as framing and mobilizing aimed at maintaining or disrupting the institutionalized status quo of EDI. We propose that a critical, power-sensitive institutional work approach to EDI is a useful lens through which to examine extra-organizational country contexts in international HRM research and, in particular, context-sensitive studies of EDI. As a practical implication, EDI and HR managers will be sensitized to the relevance of building coalitions with external stakeholders if they are to advance EDI within their organizations.
Version
Published version
Access right on openHSU
Metadata only access

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Send Feedback
  • Imprint