Publication:
Effects of tattoos on the aesthetic appreciation of human stimuli as influenced by expertise, tattoo status, and age reflecting internalized social norms

cris.customurl 19974
cris.virtual.department Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
cris.virtual.department #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.department #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.department Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
cris.virtual.departmentbrowse Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
cris.virtual.departmentbrowse Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
cris.virtualsource.department 8867192f-389a-457b-a98d-c5828ee8ac03
cris.virtualsource.department #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.department #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.department 2262cd26-fd1e-4386-ad11-3b8609bcf827
dc.contributor.author Weiler, Selina
dc.contributor.author Duer, Christian
dc.contributor.author Krämer, Dustin
dc.contributor.author Jacobsen, Thomas
dc.date.issued 2024-12-11
dc.description This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.description.abstract Scientific interest in body modifications continues to grow, and tattoos have recently become a subject of empirical aesthetics. While conceptual structures of tattoo aesthetics have been studied, the question of how tattoos are aesthetically appreciated has not yet been studied. In this study, we examined how tattoos influence the aesthetic appreciation of human stimuli and uncovered differences in beauty perceived by individuals older and younger than 50, which we consider indicative of different internalized social norms, experts (tattoo artists) and nonexperts, and tattooed and nontattooed individuals. Images of a male and a female model were manipulated to vary in the amount of tattoo coverage across six manipulation conditions: Baseline (none), Light, Moderate, Heavy, Extreme, and Extreme + Face. N = 487 participants rated the beauty of these stimuli. The results suggest overall group differences (experts vs. nonexperts; tattooed vs. nontattooed; older vs. younger). The perceived beauty of the stimuli decreased as the extent of tattoos increased, with the Extreme + Face condition standing out as the lowest rated condition. These findings confirm that tattoos influence aesthetic appreciation, which is highly dependent on expertise and social norms as indicated by age. We also discuss the generalizability and implications of the findings.
dc.description.version VoR
dc.identifier.articlenumber e0313940
dc.identifier.citation Weiler SM, Duer C, Krämer D, Jacobsen T (2024) Effects of tattoos on the aesthetic appreciation of human stimuli as influenced by expertise, tattoo status, and age reflecting internalized social norms. PLoS ONE 19(12): e0313940. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313940
dc.identifier.doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0313940
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203
dc.identifier.uri https://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/19974
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher PLOS
dc.relation.journal PLOS ONE
dc.relation.orgunit Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
dc.rights.accessRights metadata only access
dc.title Effects of tattoos on the aesthetic appreciation of human stimuli as influenced by expertise, tattoo status, and age reflecting internalized social norms
dc.type Forschungsartikel
dcterms.isPartOf https://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/19972
dspace.entity.type Publication
hsu.uniBibliography
oaire.citation.issue 12
oaire.citation.volume 19
Files