openHSU logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Log In
  • Communities & Collections
  1. Home
  2. Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg
  3. Publications
  4. 3 - Publication references (without full text)
  5. Aesthetics electrified
 
Options
Show all metadata fields

Aesthetics electrified

An analysis of descriptive symmetry and evaluative aesthetic judgment processes using event-related brain potentials
Publication date
2001-07
Document type
Forschungsartikel
Author
Jacobsen, Thomas 
Höfel, Lea
Organisational unit
Institut für Allgemeine Psychologie, Universität Leipzig
DOI
10.2190/p7w1-5f1f-njk9-x05b
URI
https://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/17171
Publisher
Baywood
Series or journal
Empirical studies of the arts
ISSN
1541-4493
Periodical volume
19
Periodical issue
2
First page
177
Last page
190
Peer-reviewed
✅
Part of the university bibliography
Nein
  • Additional Information
Language
English
Abstract
An event-related brain potential (ERP) study comparing descriptive and evaluative judgment processes is reported. Using identical stimuli to isolate perceptual from judgmental processes, the two judgment types were operationalized by employing symmetry and aesthetic judgments. Electrophysiological activity was recorded while participants viewed newly designed two-dimensional patterns in a pre-cued task setting. Judgment analyses of a Phase I test and performance in the main experiment revealed detailed paramorphic models of the individual judges' cognitive systems as well as group models. Symmetry showeda strong positive correlation with judgments and was the most important cue in every case. Descriptive judgments were performed faster than evaluative judgments. The ERPs revealed a phasic frontal negativity in the non-aesthetic condition as well as a sustained posterior negativity in the symmetrical condition. All conditions showed late positive potentials (LPP). Evaluative judgment LPPs revealed a more pronounced right lateralization. It was concluded that descriptive symmetry judgment and evaluative aesthetic judgment processes differ dramatically and recruit, at least in part, different neural machinery.
Version
Published version
Access right on openHSU
Metadata only access

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Send Feedback
  • Imprint