Publication:
Preattentive phonotactic processing as indexed by the mismatch negativity

cris.customurl 14304
cris.virtual.department Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
cris.virtual.department #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.department #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.departmentbrowse Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
cris.virtual.departmentbrowse Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
cris.virtual.departmentbrowse Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
cris.virtual.departmentbrowse Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
cris.virtual.departmentbrowse Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
cris.virtual.departmentbrowse Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
cris.virtual.departmentbrowse Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
cris.virtual.departmentbrowse Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
cris.virtual.departmentbrowse Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
cris.virtualsource.department 2262cd26-fd1e-4386-ad11-3b8609bcf827
cris.virtualsource.department #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.department #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.contributor.author Jacobsen, Thomas
dc.contributor.author Steinberg, Johanna
dc.contributor.author Truckenbrodt, Hubert
dc.date.issued 2010-10
dc.description.abstract Processing of an obligatory phonotactic restriction outside the focus of the participants ' attention was investigated by means of ERPs using (reversed) experimental oddball blocks. Dorsal fricative assimilation (DFA) is a phonotactic constraint in German grammar that is violated in *[epsilon x] but not in [ox], [epsilon integral], and [o integral]. These stimulus sequences engage the auditory deviance detection mechanism as reflected by the MMN component of the ERP. In Experiment 1 (n= 16), stimuli were contrasted pairwise such that they shared the initial vowel but differed with regard to the fricative. Phonotactically ill- formed deviants elicited stronger MMN re-sponses than well-formed deviants that differed acoustically in the sameway fromthe standard stimulation but did not contain a phonotactic violation. In Experiment 2 (n = 16), stimuli were contrasted such that they differed with regard to the vowel but shared the fricative. MMN was elicited by the vowel change. An additional, laterMMN response was observed for the phonotactically ill-formed syllable only. This MMN cannot be attributed to any phonetic or segmental difference between standard and deviant. These findings suggest that implicit phonotactic knowledge is activated and applied in preattentive speech processing.
dc.description.version VoR
dc.identifier.doi 10.1162/jocn.2009.21408
dc.identifier.doi 10.24405/14304
dc.identifier.issn 1530-8898
dc.identifier.uri https://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/14304
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher MIT Press
dc.relation.journal Journal of cognitive neuroscience
dc.relation.orgunit Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie
dc.rights.accessRights open access
dc.subject Speech sounds
dc.subject Perception
dc.subject Assimilation
dc.subject Representations
dc.subject Brain
dc.subject MMN
dc.subject.ddc 150 Psychologie de_DE
dc.title Preattentive phonotactic processing as indexed by the mismatch negativity
dc.type Research article
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplace Cambridge, Mass.
dspace.entity.type Publication
hsu.peerReviewed
hsu.uniBibliography
oaire.citation.endPage 2185
oaire.citation.issue 10
oaire.citation.startPage 2174
oaire.citation.volume 22
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
openHSU_14304.pdf
Size:
376.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
145 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: