Hartong, Sigrid

Over the past years, the potential benefits and risks of educational technologies (EdTech) in schools have been increasingly debated. At the same time, research has only started to develop a more nuanced understanding of the manifold pedagogical effects of these technologies in school and classroom practice. Within the broader context of the dtec.bw project SMASCH (Smart Schools), which aims at supporting schools in their digital transformation, this chapter focuses on concrete manifestations and effects of automated evaluation practices on teachers' work. More specifically, the study analysed the screen recordings of ten digital tests from the moment of their creation to their archiving and is equally based on interviews with teachers about their evaluative practices. The findings of the study indicate different and ambivalent processes that reconfigure the relations between teachers and technology, which we exemplify using two cases – when teachers make digital tests for later automation, and when teachers supervise the machine's actual grading and feedback provision practices. Our findings not only offer important conclusions regarding how automated evaluation can, and should, be more strongly framed in a pedagogical manner, but they can also inform the need for a careful response to the more recent rise of GenAI technologies.

Ausgehend von der Frage, wie das Thema Nachhaltigkeit im aktuellen Diskurs über Schulentwicklung in der digitalen Welt eingebettet ist, schlägt der Beitrag ein alternatives Verständnis von Nachhaltigkeit digitaler Schulentwicklungsprozesse vor. In Rückgriff auf bisherige Programme digitaler Schulentwicklung und bildungspolitische Agenden wird eine Einordnung unterschiedlicher Diskursstränge in Bezug auf Nachhaltigkeit unternommen, um das Schulentwicklungs- und Forschungsprojekt Smarte Schulen (SMASCH, www.smasch.eu) daran anknüpfend vorzustellen. Anhand des Projekts SMASCH wird ein entwicklungsorientierter Forschungsansatz beschrieben, der den Nachhaltigkeitsbegriff im empirischen Feld zum einen zur Diskussion stellt und ihn zum anderen eher als ein Anerkennen nicht auflösbarer Dilemmata nachhaltig-digitaler Schulentwicklung statt eines umfassenden Anspruchs digitaler Schulentwicklung fasst. Einblicke in bisher erhobenes Material beleuchten, dass in Schulen zwar über Nachhaltigkeit gesprochen wird, diese jedoch meist im strukturellen Sinne von Dauerhaftigkeit gefasst wird und ein inhaltliches Verständnis im Sinne eines Abwägens von Spannungsfeldern bisher nur unstrukturiert einfliesst.

Over the last decades, the way we think about space and time in relation to the field of education has changed substantially. New societal evolutions have urged scholars to come to grips with the increasing difficulty of approaching educational practices in terms of existing “static” (e.g. topographical) representations of space and “linear” (e.g. chronological) models of time. As a result, different lines of research have been developed that seek to extend our spatiotemporal understanding not only conceptually and theoretically, but also through novel methodologies and new kinds of empirical analyses. This Special Issue extensively discusses and further elaborates on one approach informing these lines of research: (social) topology. In this editorial, we outline the topological lens and discuss its origins in the field of mathematics. After discussing how topology was adopted in the broad field of the social sciences, we show how it has gradually come to inform educational research as well. We argue that the topological lens is particularly fruitful to investigate the (mutual) construction of space and time. Briefly discussing each contribution in the Special Issue, we show how the Special Issue contributes to the further development, and making accessible, of topology as an educational research approach.

Over the past years, there has been an increasing prevalence of ‘nudge thinking’ in the educational field. While (critical) research on the rising adoption of nudging has increasingly proliferated in the broader social sciences over the past decades, nudging in education–what we designate here as Edunudge–is, however, only starting to be given substantial academic attention and still requires more nuanced conceptual and empirical investigation. As we argue in this contribution, such investigations should not only carefully disentangle the enormous complexity of nudging in education, including the role of digital and automated technologies. Equally, they should take more systematically into account the traditional closeness of the fields of pedagogy and behavioral insights. In line with that argumentation, the goal of this article is to develop foundations of such an Edunudge research program, focusing on four different dimensions: the technomodalities, the political economy, the spacetimes, and the pedagogies of Edunudge.