Krick, Annika

The Special Issue on Health, Well-Being and Sustainability invites research that integrates behavioral, cultural, and systemic approaches to fostering sustainable lifestyles within work environments. This study focuses on the role of leadership in promoting employee health and healthy lifestyles, which are central dimensions of the validated Health-oriented Leadership framework. Although previous research has assumed that high levels of leader StaffCare lead to high levels of employee SelfCare and consequently to better health outcomes, inconsistent dyadic patterns have rarely been examined. In this study, we investigate dyadic relationship patterns between leaders’ StaffCare and employees’ SelfCare jointly creating a sustainable workplace health system in hybrid contexts. Using Latent Profile Analysis on a sample of N = 1104, we identify consistent and inconsistent patterns, their health and motivational outcomes after three months, as well as potential antecedents in terms of working conditions for profile membership. The consistent dyads showed expected results: high StaffCare and high SelfCare led to high health and motivation outcomes, while low StaffCare and low SelfCare resulted in the lowest outcomes. New findings emerged in inconsistent dyads. In the low leaders’ StaffCare and high employees’ SelfCare dyad (Bystanders & Health Proactives), leaders recognized risks but did not actively promote health measures. However, proactive employees who engage in SelfCare behaviorally compensate for insufficient leader support but at a motivational cost. In contrast, the high leaders’ StaffCare and low employees’ SelfCare dyad (Health Sacrificers) included leaders who supported employees’ health but neglected their own, resulting in lower health but higher motivation among employees. Job demands and resources partly predicted group membership and can offer practical implications for building work environments that foster employees’ well-being and health. The findings offer insights into inconsistent leadership behaviors and provide guidance for enhancing employee well-being, particularly in hybrid work environments.

Introduction: Previous longitudinal studies investigated loneliness in general populations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Less is known about workplace isolation among employees working from home (WFH). Based on job demands-resources and conservation-of-resources theories, this study aims to analyze workplace isolation of employees WFH in relation to their WFH intensity. Methods: This study examined the change in workplace isolation and WFH intensity over 5 measurement points of 512 employees using multilevel growth curve analysis (GCA), identified groups of participants with distinct trajectories of workplace isolation and WFH intensity using latent profile analysis (LPA), and investigated antecedents and consequences of profile membership. Results: GCA indicated an overall negative linear and quadratic relationship between time and workplace isolation, as well as interaction effects between time and WFH intensity on workplace isolation. LPA identified 3 groups: (1) high WFH intensity and low isolation, (2) low WFH intensity and high isolation, (3) high WFH intensity and high isolation. Subsequent analyses revealed that individuals in profile 1 had high levels of health-oriented self-leadership (SelfCare) and social support by colleagues, and low levels of communication difficulties, health-oriented employee-leadership (StaffCare) and extraversion. Regarding differences, highest commitment was identified among individuals displaying low WFH intensity (profile 2), whereas highest self-rated performance was prevalent among individuals experiencing low workplace isolation (profile 1). Discussion: Applying GCA and LPA in this line of research is novel and adds to the understanding of both between-and within-effects of workplace isolation and WFH intensity. Knowledge about relevant resources (e.g., SelfCare) and demands (e.g., communication difficulties) may inform organizational practices aimed at preventing isolation in remote and hybrid work settings.

The health-oriented leadership (HoL) intervention is an innovative leadership and team development measure to promote workplace health. This article outlines the steps of the HoL intervention, the necessary organizational conditions, and the benefits for leaders and teams. The HoL intervention is based on the HoL concept, which distinguishes between health-oriented leadership (staff-care) and health-oriented self-leadership (self-care) and emphasizes four pathways through which leadership affects employee health. The HoL intervention is a structured procedure consisting of the eight steps: 1) coordination meeting with top management, 2) general information event for leaders of an organization, 3) preliminary conversation with interested leader, 4) kick-off workshop with the team and leader, 5) diagnosis of health-oriented leadership using the HoL instrument, 6) intensive coaching session with the leader, 7) workshop with the team and leader, and 8) follow-up with the leader. Previous implementations in various sectors revealed positive evaluation results.

In diesem Artikel der Zeitschrift Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. wird die Führungskräfte-Onlineplattform Digital Leadership Assistance Platform (DigiLAP) vorgestellt. Dabei wird auf die wissenschaftliche Entwicklung eingegangen, der Aufbau und die wesentlichen Funktionen sowie erste Ergebnisse der wissenschaftlichen Evaluation vorgestellt. Darüber hinaus werden Nutzungsmöglichkeiten für die Personalentwicklung und Führungskräfte dargestellt und abschließend auf Weiterentwicklungspotenzial für die Zukunft eingegangen.

The rapid evolution of remote and hybrid work arrangements has fundamentally reshaped leadership dynamics, presenting novel challenges and opportunities. As "new ways of working" increasingly become the norm, their impact on our professional lives promises to be long-lasting. This study delves into several critical areas centring around good leadership practices in increasingly digitalized and virtual settings: 1) the applicability of transformational and health-oriented leadership styles in remote and hybrid settings; 2) the impact of effective leadership on employee outcomes; 3) the dependency of leadership effectiveness in remote and hybrid environments on specific working conditions; 4) the benefits that leaders derive from employing healthy leadership styles; and lastly, 5) the distinctive challenges leaders face when managing teams remotely versus in traditional office settings. Our findings are drawn from data collected from two samples throughout Germany and across all sectors. Sample 1 consisted 1318 leaders 2180 employees surveyed in April 2021, sample 2 were 907 leaders and 2124 employees surveyed in September 2022. In our discussion, we outline practical implications for leaders and HR professionals, spotlighting strategies for integrating effective leadership practices within remote and hybrid work frameworks. This study not only highlights the evolving nature of leadership in the digital age but also offers insights into fostering a productive and supportive work environment, irrespective of the physical workspace.

Im Rahmen des dtec.bw-geförderten Projektes „Digital Leadership and Health“ wurde eine wissenschaftlich fundierte und praxisnahe Lern- und Feedback-Plattform entwickelt, die Führungskräfte in ihrer digitalen Führung unterstützt. Die „Digital Leadership Assistance Platform (DigiLAP)“ ist ein Online-Tool, in dem sich Führungskräfte bezüglich der Chancen und Risiken des digitalen und hybriden Arbeitens, Führens und Zusammenarbeitens selbstständig weiterbilden können. In verschiedenen Basis- und Vertiefungsmodulen vermittelt DigiLAP Informationen zu relevanten Themen wie Gesundheit im Arbeitskontext, Führung, Zusammenhalt im Team oder Zusammenarbeit in Meetings. Führungskräfte haben zudem die Möglichkeit, ihre Situation bezogen auf die verschiedenen Themenbereiche anhand von Selbstchecks zu überprüfen und ihre Einschätzung durch Team-Befragungen mit der Sichtweise ihrer Mitarbeitenden zu vergleichen. Im „Cockpit“ können die Führungskräfte die Befragungsergebnisse anhand eines Ampelsystems im Blick behalten und Entwicklungsverläufe beobachten. Passend zu den Ergebnissen werden konkrete Handlungsempfehlungen und Übungen vorgeschlagen, welche die Führungskräfte dazu befähigen sollen, sich und ihr Team in den kritischen Bereichen weiterzuentwickeln. In einer ersten Testphase wurde DigiLAP von Führungskräften und FachexpertInnen aus Wissenschaft und Praxis ausführlich getestet und anhand einer quantitativen Befragung (N = 30) sowie im Rahmen von Fokusgruppen (N = 18) evaluiert. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass DigiLAP ein hilfreiches Instrument zur Weiterentwicklung digitaler Führungskompetenzen darstellt, welches Führungskräfte durch die eigenständige Bearbeitung sowie Möglichkeit der individuellen Rückmeldung flexibel und maßgeschneidert unterstützt. Nach Abschluss der Testphase wird die Plattform online (kosten)frei zugänglich sein, wodurch Führungskräfte im deutschsprachigen Raum von DigiLAP profitieren können.

The rise of remote collaboration tools is transforming team collaboration. Despite its current limitations, Virtual Reality (VR) technology has the potential to overcome the challenges of traditional video calls and enhance remote meetings in the future. This study compares the effectiveness of VR and video calls (MS Teams) on team collaboration. A total of N = 90 participants were performing a problem-solving task, and N = 127 were conducting a creative task in both conditions (VR and video call). Measures of meeting evaluation, engagement, performance, and fatigue were assessed. The results reveal that video call collaboration is superior to enhancing performance. In comparison, VR offers significant benefits regarding comfort, social interaction, and engagement, particularly with creativity tasks. However, at the current stage of technical development, using VR, regardless of the task, is exhausting and causes fatigue. This research highlights the potential of VR as an effective tool for remote collaboration, emphasizing the importance of selecting the right platform based on the specific needs of the collaborative context.