Krick, Annika

The rise of remote collaboration tools is transforming team collaboration. Despite its current limitations, Virtual Reality (VR) technology has the potential to overcome the challenges of traditional video calls and enhance remote meetings in the future. This study compares the effectiveness of VR and video calls (MS Teams) on team collaboration. A total of N = 90 participants were performing a problem-solving task, and N = 127 were conducting a creative task in both conditions (VR and video call). Measures of meeting evaluation, engagement, performance, and fatigue were assessed. The results reveal that video call collaboration is superior to enhancing performance. In comparison, VR offers significant benefits regarding comfort, social interaction, and engagement, particularly with creativity tasks. However, at the current stage of technical development, using VR, regardless of the task, is exhausting and causes fatigue. This research highlights the potential of VR as an effective tool for remote collaboration, emphasizing the importance of selecting the right platform based on the specific needs of the collaborative context.

Im Rahmen des dtec.bw-geförderten Projektes „Digital Leadership and Health“ wurde eine wissenschaftlich fundierte und praxisnahe Lern- und Feedback-Plattform entwickelt, die Führungskräfte in ihrer digitalen Führung unterstützt. Die „Digital Leadership Assistance Platform (DigiLAP)“ ist ein Online-Tool, in dem sich Führungskräfte bezüglich der Chancen und Risiken des digitalen und hybriden Arbeitens, Führens und Zusammenarbeitens selbstständig weiterbilden können. In verschiedenen Basis- und Vertiefungsmodulen vermittelt DigiLAP Informationen zu relevanten Themen wie Gesundheit im Arbeitskontext, Führung, Zusammenhalt im Team oder Zusammenarbeit in Meetings. Führungskräfte haben zudem die Möglichkeit, ihre Situation bezogen auf die verschiedenen Themenbereiche anhand von Selbstchecks zu überprüfen und ihre Einschätzung durch Team-Befragungen mit der Sichtweise ihrer Mitarbeitenden zu vergleichen. Im „Cockpit“ können die Führungskräfte die Befragungsergebnisse anhand eines Ampelsystems im Blick behalten und Entwicklungsverläufe beobachten. Passend zu den Ergebnissen werden konkrete Handlungsempfehlungen und Übungen vorgeschlagen, welche die Führungskräfte dazu befähigen sollen, sich und ihr Team in den kritischen Bereichen weiterzuentwickeln. In einer ersten Testphase wurde DigiLAP von Führungskräften und FachexpertInnen aus Wissenschaft und Praxis ausführlich getestet und anhand einer quantitativen Befragung (N = 30) sowie im Rahmen von Fokusgruppen (N = 18) evaluiert. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass DigiLAP ein hilfreiches Instrument zur Weiterentwicklung digitaler Führungskompetenzen darstellt, welches Führungskräfte durch die eigenständige Bearbeitung sowie Möglichkeit der individuellen Rückmeldung flexibel und maßgeschneidert unterstützt. Nach Abschluss der Testphase wird die Plattform online (kosten)frei zugänglich sein, wodurch Führungskräfte im deutschsprachigen Raum von DigiLAP profitieren können.

The rapid evolution of remote and hybrid work arrangements has fundamentally reshaped leadership dynamics, presenting novel challenges and opportunities. As "new ways of working" increasingly become the norm, their impact on our professional lives promises to be long-lasting. This study delves into several critical areas centring around good leadership practices in increasingly digitalized and virtual settings: 1) the applicability of transformational and health-oriented leadership styles in remote and hybrid settings; 2) the impact of effective leadership on employee outcomes; 3) the dependency of leadership effectiveness in remote and hybrid environments on specific working conditions; 4) the benefits that leaders derive from employing healthy leadership styles; and lastly, 5) the distinctive challenges leaders face when managing teams remotely versus in traditional office settings. Our findings are drawn from data collected from two samples throughout Germany and across all sectors. Sample 1 consisted 1318 leaders 2180 employees surveyed in April 2021, sample 2 were 907 leaders and 2124 employees surveyed in September 2022. In our discussion, we outline practical implications for leaders and HR professionals, spotlighting strategies for integrating effective leadership practices within remote and hybrid work frameworks. This study not only highlights the evolving nature of leadership in the digital age but also offers insights into fostering a productive and supportive work environment, irrespective of the physical workspace.

Research shows positive effects of Health-oriented Leadership (HoL) on followers' health. However, irritation elicited by ICT hassles may reduce leaders' capacity to engage in staff care. This study examines whether ICT hassles are associated with staff care (i.e., health-promoting follower-directed leadership) via irritation and whether particularly those engaging in self-care suffer more or less from ICT demands. A moderated mediation model was tested at three measurement points (N = 582 leaders). As expected, results show more irritation for leaders with more ICT hassles which is further associated with less staff care. Moreover, the positive relationship between ICT hassles and irritation was stronger for leaders displaying high self-care. In the same vein, the negative relationship between irritation and staff care was stronger for leaders engaging in self-care. Findings provide the first evidence that ICT hassles are negatively related to staff care via leaders' irritation. Leaders who engage in self-care show less irritation and higher staff care but suffer more from ICT demands. To promote leaders' health and staff care in digital working contexts, organizations should provide reliable IT equipment and technical support. The study ties in with research on digital leadership and its antecedents and offers a new view on the interplay of demands and resources.

Introduction: Telework brings opportunities (e.g., flexibility) but also potential risks for health (e.g., fewer boundaries, constant availability). SelfCare could be a relevant work-related resource to reduce these health risks when working from home. SelfCare is part of the Health-oriented Leadership model and describes how individuals prioritize their own health, are aware of signs of stress, and actively promote their own health. In this paper, we postulate that telework enables more SelfCare at home, e.g., due to higher flexibility and autonomy. As SelfCare at home can be used more flexibly, it is also conceivable that the effectiveness of SelfCare increases the more employees work from home. Additionally, for hybrid working employees, the question arises whether SelfCare at both work contexts is distinct and makes an independent contribution to health and whether they even reinforce each other. Methods: Our hypotheses were tested in a longitudinal study with N = 727 employees from different industries. This study examined (1) the level of SelfCare on-site and at home (within- and between-person-effects), (2) the moderating effect of telework intensity on the effectiveness of SelfCare at home on health and performance indicators, and (3) direct and interacting effects of SelfCare at home and on-site for health. Results: Between- and within-person-differences show that SelfCare is more prevalent when working from home. Furthermore, SelfCare at home is related to less strain and health complaints as well as more relaxation and performance for individuals with higher telework intensity. SelfCare at home and on-site independently predict strain and health complaints and interact with regard to strain. Discussion: SelfCare appears to be more relevant with higher telework intensity and is thus an even more important health resource in the telework context. Organizations should provide continuing interventions and online tools to promote SelfCare among employees and leaders. Since little is known about the level and the effects of SelfCare in the telework context, these findings expand previous research on Health-oriented Leadership in the telework context.

Objectives: While stressors of military deployment are known to have profound effects on health, less is known about effective methods for promoting health. A few studies have examined the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) in this context; however, fewer have used an active control group and objective health indicators. Therefore, this study examined the effects of an MBI in comparison to a similarly structured traditional stress management intervention (progressive muscle relaxation, PMR) on health indicators among military personnel. Method: Using a 2 (pre vs. post) × 3 (group: MBI, PMR vs. inactive control group, ICG) experimental mixed design, participants (MBI, n = 118; PMR, n = 55; ICG, n = 156) answered baseline and post-intervention self-reported measures. Physiological parameters were assessed before and after each session. Results: Results showed that MBI is superior to PMR and ICG, leading to higher increases in mindfulness, positive affect, and self-care, and greater decreases in physical complaints. This is also confirmed by objective data. Participants in the MBI demonstrated improved heart rate variability and reduced heart rate, while no change was evident for PMR and ICG. However, both MBI and PMR were equally effective in reducing strain. Conclusions: This study provides further evidence for the effectiveness of MBIs in this specific professional group based on rigorous methodology (comparing to a competing intervention, self reported and objective measures). MBI is even more effective than PMR as a traditional health intervention in terms of promoting mindfulness, positive affect, and health behavior, as well as reducing complaints. Preregistration: This study is not preregistered.

Due to growing demands, there is an increase in depression and burnout causing sickness absence and early retirement. Detecting depression and burnout at an early stage is a crucial task for leaders to allow for early support and prevent more severe illnesses. Within the health-oriented leadership concept, awareness is the ability to recognize followers’ warning signals as a potential health risk. Although it is widely accepted that awareness is a precondition to taking appropriate action, it is yet unclear to what extent leaders recognize the warning signals of followers and which factors facilitate or impede awareness. In an experimental study (N = 54) and a survey study (N = 215) we examined antecedents of awareness in followers and leaders: (a) clarity of displayed warning signals in followers, (b) leaders’ stressors, (c) leaders’ autonomy. Even under favorable conditions, only about half of the leaders recognized warning signals as a health risk. Leaders showed lower awareness during times of high stress and low autonomy and when followers displayed less clear warning signals. Autonomy moderated the effect of stress (workload) on awareness, but there was no buffering effect as expected. The findings deepen the theoretical understanding of awareness and suggest that leaders need to know how their awareness may be impeded. We provide practical recommendations for human resource management on how leaders’ awareness can be fostered.

In den vergangenen Jahren sind flexible Arbeitsmodelle und Homeoffice-Möglichkeiten vermehrt in den Vordergrund gerückt. Besonders durch die Corona-Pandemie ist der Anteil an im Homeoffice arbeitenden Beschäftigten stark angestiegen. Homeoffice wird auch in Zukunft ein zentraler Bestandteil der Arbeitswelt sein. Jedoch bringt die Arbeit im Homeoffice auch Herausforderungen mit sich. Vor allem für Führungskräfte stellt sich die Frage, wie sie auch über die Distanz einen positiven Einfluss auf ihre Mitarbeitenden nehmen können. Auf Grundlage von Studien aus dem traditionellen Bürokontext und aktuellen Studien zur Führung im digitalen Kontext werden in diesem Beitrag erste Antworten auf diese Frage gegeben und untersucht, wie sich 1) das Ausmaß und 2) die Effektivität von gesundheitsorientierter und transformationaler Führung im digitalen Kontext verändern. Die Befunde aktueller Studien zeigen zudem, dass digitale Führung mit spezifischen Herausforderungen für Führungskräfte einhergeht durch, z. B. limitierte Kommunikationsmöglichkeiten oder auch technische Herausforderungen. Gleichzeitig zeigen diese Studien aber auch, dass Führungskräfte auch im Homeoffice einen positiven Einfluss auf ihre Mitarbeitenden nehmen können. Dies kann durch die systematische Nutzung von Onlinetools und Förderung der Kommunikation unterstützt werden. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden erste Hinweise darauf gegeben, wie Führungskräfte mit den Herausforderungen im digitalen Kontext umgehen können, um weiterhin einen positiven Einfluss auf ihre Mitarbeitenden zu nehmen.